05-19-2024, 05:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2024, 05:23 PM by Uniongarage.)
The link is in the dust bin file thread , sorry .
Or unrelated thread
Or unrelated thread
Join us in the search for Free Energy. Share your experiments and discoveries, post your build logs, and discuss.
We have a strict No-Troll policy. So you can post without fear of being ridiculed.
New Members- Check Your Spam Folder For Activation Link
Please read our Rules. Any problems or suggestions- Contact Us
Neutralizing The Gate.... Video by Jim Mac
|
05-19-2024, 05:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2024, 05:23 PM by Uniongarage.)
The link is in the dust bin file thread , sorry .
Or unrelated thread
05-19-2024, 05:42 PM
OH, I tried again and found it here. 14 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeiJeWLN9pE
05-20-2024, 02:53 AM
(05-19-2024, 05:42 PM)Norman Wrote: OH, I tried again and found it here. 14 mins I'm not sure why he hasn't put the second actuator at the 180° mark and call it a day. It looked like it was getting a good half turn. Thanks for posting, looks easy to replicate and improve the effect.
05-20-2024, 09:18 AM
I think I got it with this drawing.
the 4 steps are described in the drawing and its the yellow part that is repelled and gives free PM work. And then it can be unrepelled and return to the original position to repeat the process. Norman
05-20-2024, 10:19 AM
Between step 2 and 3 to show the polarities are all balanced out and ready to reset in step 3 and 4.
I present this for others to get ideas and take it further. I will work on its embodiment but in the past I have failed not because of a lack of OU but because there was not enough OU to do the switching. For meaurement I will lift 4 weights wih the repel to make each step movement but there also needs to be more work to release each one of those movements and that is where I have always failed. I think it will take 200-300% OU to do the movements and the switching. Norman
05-20-2024, 11:58 AM
A very brief description of what is accomplished.
1. we set up a repel force without the loss of work from a squeeze. 2. Then we move the balanced magnet sets to release that repel force. I chose repel because of "closer stronger" is a better way to get the most power. Norman (05-20-2024, 02:53 AM)unimmortal Wrote:(05-19-2024, 05:42 PM)Norman Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeiJeWLN9pE Raymondslab (05-21-2024, 10:55 AM)Norman Wrote:(05-20-2024, 02:53 AM)unimmortal Wrote:(05-19-2024, 05:42 PM)Norman Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeiJeWLN9pE Raymondslab
05-21-2024, 05:38 PM
" Norman Wrote: OH, I tried again and found it here. 14 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeiJeWLN9pE " Ray is not taking in to account, that the force required to move an inch is greater during the part of the rotation, in which he pushes his rotor into the repelling field of his "activator".
05-21-2024, 07:05 PM
(05-18-2024, 08:11 PM)Norman Wrote: I think I had the magnet polarities wrong so here is the correction. Norman (05-21-2024, 05:38 PM)floor Wrote: " Norman Wrote: OH, I tried again and found it here. 14 mins Are you sure? Please review the video starting at 6 minutes when he demonstrates the approach pulls on his testing wand. It seems to show the "activator" pulling it in. But then again, I have made many setups with pulls it in from close, but still ends up cancelling.
05-22-2024, 05:25 AM
I'm not quite sure what you mean by canceling? What it seems to show is it has a weak attraction an a strong repulsion effect. Did I miss something? I'm not understanding what you mean by Canceling?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|