Join us in the search for Free Energy. Share your experiments and discoveries, post your build logs, and discuss.

We have a strict No-Troll policy. So you can post without fear of being ridiculed.

New Members- Check Your Spam Folder For Activation Link

Please read our Rules. Any problems or suggestions- Contact Us

 


Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Practical build log generator Figuera
#21
Hi Lasco-  I am trying to grasp the concept.  Allow me to ask a few questions-  sorry if this is obvious:

1.  Can you draw in the battery placement please?

2.  When you say "Negative feed the brush",  I assume the "negative" means the electromagnet that is always lower potential than the other?

3.  I assume the battery Positive also feeds the brush.  So really, the commutator closes the input and output coil onto itself on the shrinking stage?

Thanks for your contributions and sorry if I don not catch on right away.
Reply
#22
L
(04-16-2025, 08:10 PM)Jim Mac Wrote: Hi Lasco-  I am trying to grasp the concept.  Allow me to ask a few questions-  sorry if this is obvious:

1.  Can you draw in the battery placement please?

2.  When you say "Negative feed the brush",  I assume the "negative" means the electromagnet that is always lower potential than the other?

3.  I assume the battery Positive also feeds the brush.  So really, the commutator closes the input and output coil onto itself on the shrinking stage?

Thanks for your contributions and sorry if I don not catch on right away.

   
Reply
#23
Thanks Lasco-  that is much clearer.  

I re-drew it to assume the main commutator does not spin, to eliminate 1 extra brush, and to orient everything a little differently, as how I would build it. .  Can you confirm I got this correct?  ( I know my timing and brush placement is not correct)

   

It appears that only 1 series of primaries has a completed circuit at any given time. And from your timing description, each series of electromagnets is only closed circuit from dead middle to bottom, back to middle,  then switch.  Is this correct?
Reply
#24
https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/p...c-machines

Talks about commutators and brushes. Patent number holds sequence 369. Who knows maybe here is some secret.
Reply
#25
(04-17-2025, 07:34 AM)Jim Mac Wrote: Thanks Lasco-  that is much clearer.  

I re-drew it to assume the main commutator does not spin, to eliminate 1 extra brush, and to orient everything a little differently, as how I would build it. .  Can you confirm I got this correct?  ( I know my timing and brush placement is not correct)



It appears that only 1 series of primaries has a completed circuit at any given time. And from your timing description, each series of electromagnets is only closed circuit from dead middle to bottom, back to middle,  then switch.  Is this correct?

Yes only problem that I have is arcing - on switching commutator 
I have find out that 30 uf /450V helps to reduce the Sparcs to bare minimum 
Second problem is ability to adjust timing - commutator gap against centre of the resistance and third is correct selection of resistance 
And lastly impedance of primary coils 
I have find out that wire on Primeries must be large to keep resistance down
I’m thinking that time constant of primary must be in lowest values 
And also after I have introduced capacitor ( motor run AC cap) 30uF it only need half of spinning speed 
Meaning rpm to get 50Hz is half from expected

Normály to get 50Hz you need 3000rpm with set up like this only 1500 is required to get 50Hz
But all components must tune right
I’m struggling to get right balance on everything 
But that is what we all trying to do

Last comment for whole Figuera community is that patent says That primaries are N and S and exactly that is correct!!
All this nonsense of opposing N-N is elaborate disinformation 
I have just now made new secondary coil and first time in my life I can light boule!!!
No overunity no miracles but at least some progress

The biggest thing is if primaries must be in series all my work to tune one triplet is useless 
Due resistance will add in series connection and that throw everything out of tune

I thing this device would be scalable with great difficulty due to fine balance of components 
   

These two elements need to be adjusted for aliment 

And here we go again - need to build commutator that will have easy access to change resistors and easy aliment for timing - the best will be to be able to change timing while it is running 
More work………
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)