Join us in the search for Free Energy. Share your experiments and discoveries, post your build logs, and discuss.

We have a strict No-Troll policy. So you can post without fear of being ridiculed.

New Members- Check Your Spam Folder For Activation Link

Please read our Rules. Any problems or suggestions- Contact Us

 

Other Overunity Forums:

Overunity Machines   ||   Overunity Research



Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reversing Lenz Project
#41
Hey Jim I believe monopoles exist, at least I think they can be produced and have been produced by others and I have also made them.

   


Dave Wing
Reply
#42
(07-09-2024, 05:16 PM)Dave Wing Wrote: Hey Jim I believe monopoles exist, at least I think they can be produced and have been produced by others and I have also made them.


Dave Wing

Hi Dave. I guess it depends on your definition of what a monopole is. 

If you were traveling One way, by logic you have to be traveling away from a different way. 

As you get closer to your destination, you get further away from your house. 

As you get older, you get farther away from your birth. 

All current, and magnetism, have to complete a loop back to the source in which it originated. 

I would like to see and hear more about what you have to present, but it is probably best for a new topic.
Reply
#43
(07-09-2024, 04:27 PM)dd_alf Wrote: Ok, I guess I understand what's going on. When the coil is on the other side, the bridge faces its bottom side. However, when the coil is on the same side, you have now the coil's  top-side facing the bridge (in respect to scope wiring). which inverts the scope reading.

Ok so first..  Metal in front of a magnet induces 2 polarities in the metal..  The metal turns into a magnet..  The metal side nearest to the magnets Pole becomes the OPPOSITE Pole.

   

So if the coil is on the same side of the magnet-  It is being induced by a NORTH Pole metal.

But if the coil is on the other side away from the magnet,  the coil is induced with a SOUTH pole metal.
Reply
#44
The next part to understand, which I briefly mentioned before,  is this..

The coil also induces a magnetic field into the metal..  And it works in the same manner as described above.  If the coil turns SOUTH towards the metal, the end of the metal closest to the coil turns NORTH..  

The thing to remember, magnetics ALWAYS induce the polarity that will Oppose the change.  

In my current understanding,  this should work out to a Lenz Free generator is built right and if the coil is switched at the right timing.  I am NOT convinced we can actually reverse Lenz though..

We may see a speedup effect - but this is not proof we reversed lenz.  I have built several generators that speed up under load but are not reversing lenz.  

To claim Lenz has been reversed requires absolute proof:  And the proof is to show it also speeds up with an AIR CORE COIL. If you have an iron core and you are only comparing Open circuit verses Closed circuit, it is not a conclusive test.  To be conclusive, you first need to measure RPM with No Core or coil present.  Then prove it spins quicker when you add a core and coil.

IMHO, anything shy of that proof is most likely eddy current related.  Meaning, a motor can spin 2000 RPM no core or coil around.  Add the core and coil, it now spins 1500 RPM because eddy currents of the core.  Close the circuit and it now speeds up to 1700 RPM..  YES we got speedup under load-  but it did not reverse Lenz.  It just negated some eddy currents.

To prove it,  as I said-  first measure RPM with no coil..  Then prove you can make it go quicker under load than it goes with No coil or core around.
Reply
#45
Hmm. I'm an old man. I've been working with magnets for 50 years. With all the respect, you don't need to explain me that each magnet has two poles.

Actually there are no poles, just one ferromagnetic vector anomaly in space, but anyway.

Your diagram with the iron bolt: when the coil is on the same side, then the bolt must be aligned horizontally. Hence, again, the same pole hits the coil. Sure it's about the shape of the bridge. That's why I call it bridge, and not wall.
Reply
#46
(07-10-2024, 02:28 PM)dd_alf Wrote: Hmm. I'm an old man. I've been working with magnets for 50 years. With all the respect, you don't need to explain me that each magnet has two poles.

Actually there are no poles, just one ferromagnetic vector anomaly in space, but anyway.

Your diagram with the iron bolt: when the coil is on the same side, then the bolt must be aligned horizontally. Hence, again, the same pole hits the coil. Sure it's about the shape of the bridge. That's why I call it bridge, and not wall.

I am simply stating something that is well known..  See the Chat GPT Answer:

   

And as I said, I can show undeniable proof with a simple scope, magnet, metal, and coil that anyone can replicate to verify.

I am not stating a "theory".

"Magnetizing Metal with A Magnet turns the metal into a magnet with 2 poles.  The End of the metal closest to the magnet takes the OPPOSITE polarity as the magnet facing the metal"..

Opposite poles attract..  And metal sticks to magnets.  If the magnet induced the same polarity into the metal closest to the magnet- the metal would REPEL off the magnet.  But it doesn't.
Reply
#47
The premise of the Adams motor was to have the generator coils/cores effectvitely become magnets through proximity (1-2mm), and then switching the generator coils of to get a negative response from the rotor magnet.
Reply
#48
So so here is the video I made showing it.  Anyone can repeat it 

Reply
#49
Good explainer Jim. Such a simple example.
Reply
#50
(07-10-2024, 07:07 PM)unimmortal Wrote: Good explainer Jim. Such a simple example.

Thanks..  it is not even debated -  Magnetism 101 quizes explain this..

"if you place a piece of iron on one end of a magnet, the end of the piece nearer to the magnet will cause the opposite polarity through a magnetic induction process."

https://byjus.com/question-answer/a-magn...-near-end/
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)