Multiple Free Energy Technology Systems

[Lunkster]

My name is Jay Lunke.

I have been intermittently working with new free eneregy devices since 1969.
Over the years, I have come up with several new free energy technologies for motors, generators and electrical circuits.
From the work I have seen people do, and the work I have done, I see that the most promising way to get free energy into peoples homes is through open sourse so that people can work off of each others ideas.  

I have written five free energy books through Kindle Direct Publishing that I try to offer the kindle version free 5 days every three months.  All of my devices and circuits are intended to be open source.  You have to do your own research that someone else may have come up with the same idea in the millions of patents that are out there.  

I believe that the mechanical design should have several design features in them that improves the performace over other devices on the market today.  There should also be efficient power delivery systems along with power recover techneques from collapsing magnetic flux areas in the design that can be reused in the systems again.  Incorporaring a free energy motor along with free energy generator into a free energy system should be a part of the system designs.  One or more of the modules of the free energy system must have a COP > 1.  If all the sub-assemblies have a COP greater than one, then you will be insured of the free energy system.  All of my new free energy designs have that as the goal of the design.

The name of my first book is "A free gift that my be free energy or over unity to the world.  This book has three new technologies I have come up with.  The first is called "Flow Through Motor Technology".  The second one I call "Three Layer Electrical-Mechanical Movement Technology".  The third is called "Recovery From Collapsing Magnetic Field Technology".

The name of my second book is "Permanent Magnet Torque Harvesting".  This book further developes the technologies from book one into several different applications of the technologies.  This book also introduces a new technology I call "Indirect Power Generation".  These designs are in theory are reducing the back EMF that conventional generators have in there desiigns.

The name of my third book is "AAAAA Amazing Apperatuses Applying Abundant Abilities".  This book focuses on a new technology I have come up will, I call "Chain Reaction Flux Switching Technology".  The theory can be used in both motor and generator designs.  If this new technology is viable, then the COP of these devices will be much greater than one.

The name of my fourth book is "Motionless Switching Magnetosphere Electric Generation"  This book goes deeper into the "Chain Reaction Flux Swithing Technology" into several generator designs.  If this technology and generator are viable, then you could build the generator and use your current electro-mechanical devices.

The name of my fifth book is "The Core to Free Energy".  This book uses a couple of new technologies that I have not used in any of my other books.  It does use some of the technologies from my other books in a few of the designs, but the main focus is these new technologies.  One of the motor designs, uses three flux amplification technologies into the design one of the three technologies does require more electrical to get more torque power from the motor.  The other two torque amplification technologies amplify the torque without increasing the input power to the motor.

My test lab is very limited in scope.  I have proved out some sub-routines on the bench, but I am old and do not have the resources to build and test all of the designs I have placed in my books.  I hope that other people will read my books and will eather use my designs in thier devices, or come up with thier own ideas.

The attachments are a small examples of the drawings I have in the books I have written.  I feel that drawings are a better way for me to show my ideas. 

Jay Lunke

   

   

   

[Jim Mac]

Hi Jay,

I remember reading your interesting ideas at OU.com.  Welcome- Glad to see ya here..

[dd_alf]

Interesting designs, but it's too much detail to wrap my head around. What I usually endorse is very short and simple explanations of the core principle.

I fully agree on the open source aspect and wish you success with your books and of course the designs IRL.

[Lunkster]

Hello Again,
erage
In the books I have written, most of the motor and generator designs have electrical energy in them.  The last drawing I posted last post was a motor design that did not use any electrical energy in the design.  In the drawings below I want to show you more of the design because from the crude testing on different sub-assemblies I have done, I think that this design should be locked at by other people.

1.  The flux switching magnets should cancel the torque in them between going into and out of thier switching mode.
2.  The flux cycle created in the gap area of the motor has about three times more leverage than the switching area of the motor.  This means the torque generated in the gap are is about three times stronger than the torque of the switchng area to turn the shaft.
3.  This the gap area cycles flux from no flux to that of two pwrmnent magnets, a flux wave is created that can utilize that flux to generate forward torque on the motor assemby my the proper offset of the rotor tabs in relationship to the stator tab assemblies.
4.  The design has flux moving in the toroidal type of path that is very efficient.
5.  The testing I have done showed my that four rotor tabs moving through the stator tabs produce 2.28 times the torque with the same amount of flux through the gap erea.  Yes my test fixtures were very crude.  BUt someone should do the same test.  The thinner the tabs, the more torque I got in my testing.


   

   

   

   

   

   

I look forward to your input to these concepts.

[Lunkster]

Hello again,

The following two sketches are inprovement to my generators for the first time.  I still need to update one of my books with these improvements.

   

These generators use a switching rotating permanent magnet or switching electro-magnet to reroute the flux from several permanent magnets.  The generator has a switch magnet with one of more fin assemblies attached to both the top and bottom of the switching magnet.  In theory, the switching magnet will creates two different flux routes in the fin assembly in accordence with the polarity if the switchng magnet.  One flux route will be that the switch will support the flux from the permanent magnets to flow through each other and through the switchong magnet starving the flux flow through each of the output coils.  The other flux route is that the switching magnet blocks the flow of flux from the fin permanent magnets to flow through the switchng magnet.  So the flux from both the switching magnet and each to the permanent magnets to cycle through the output coils parrellel with each output coil.   It is the flux changing in value through the output coils that generates electrical power in the generator.

In theory, there is more changing flux movement through the sum of the output coils than the sum of the flux generated by the switching magnet.  This in turn should produce more power than the power needed to operate the switching coil.  Now a series of testing needs to be done with different resistance loads.  Lower loads may not produce the overunity.  There may be a threshold where overunity is achieved.

I am showing the switching permanent magnet sketch first because the non-electrical motor can be used to operate the generator.  The second generator can be used in conjunction with an AC power source to power the generator in order to amplify the power for the devices that are operated with the generator.

   

What is new about these two motor designs than what I have in my book on these styles of generators is fact that  the book, the generator had all the magnets in all the fin assemblies in the same dirrection.  This would create a distorted sign wave under load.  In the book, I would have two generators in series to each other, one with permanent magnets in one dirrection with the second generator with the permanent magnets in the other dirrection.  This in theory would produce a much better sign wave.  Now in these now designs, I alternate the fin assemblies so that the one fin will have the magnets in one dirrection while the magnets in the net fin assemby in the other dirrection.  In this way one generator will have a good sign wave for power generation.

These generators in theory are a way to utilize the power that permanent magnets have always had in them.

Lunkster

[Lunkster]

Hello

Some of my designs are new to me.
The following three drawings have questions about different aspects of the design.
I would like to know if anyone has answers to my questions.
I like to design multiple possible methods into each of my devices because it gives my designs a better change to be successful.
Any thoughts good or bad would be helpful.

   

   

   

When adding multiple methods together,  I came up with the following design.

   

Lunkster

[Lunkster]

Hello,

The following drawing drawing is a test fixture that should be easy for people to build and test the affect of having multiple rotor tabs in the flux gap area of a toroid magnet circuit.  It would be nice to see other peoples test results.

   

With the Three Torque Amplification Technology Motor I have shown in other posts, I want to talk a little bit about the power delivery to the motor.
The motor has one rotor tab for three toroid coils.  Each coil is connected to one of three power circuits.  Each power circuit has a power cycle of 33%.  The stator produces forward torque on the rotor with no reverse torque at all on the rotor.  That with the efficieencies of the toroid configuration will create a very efficient motor as far as input power requirements.  The rotor does not have permanent magnets or electro-magnets on it to restrict the rotation of the rotor in the motor.

   

The next drawiing combines several potential overunity methods into one motor assembly.  When you combine several OU technologies together, then all you need is one of them to be valid in order to produce an overunity device.
This motor design has one rotor tab for each stator device.  The motor has two power circuits.  One for the even toroid coils and one for the odd coils.  The permanet magnrts alternate with each of the coils.  There are four segments of configuration in the motor assembly that cycle over and over again.  In the first segment of travel, the odd toroid coils power on at a 25% duty cycle.  In the second segment of travel, the rotor is pulled and travels in alignment with the forward permanent magnet assembly.  In the third segment of travel, the even toroid coils are turned on forming a functional magnet with the adjacent permanent magnts to align the rotor tab with the stator tab assemblies.  In the forth segment of travel, the power to the motor is turned of and the forward permanet magnet pulls the rotor into alignment with the stator tab assemblies.  The process starts all over again.  Note that when the power is turned off, the momentum of the rotor rotation will pull the rotor in alignment with forward permanent magnet.  As the tab moves farther away from the trailing permant magnet, the torque become greater in it's pull on the rotor.  So this motor switching from permanent magnet torque to functional magnet torque in order to produce forward torque on each segment of travel on the rotor assembly with the input power to the motor being at a 50% duty cycle.


   



The following drawing is to show that the gap area could be expanded closer to the shaft at the same time farther out from the shaft in order to reduce the flux losses in the air gap.  The tabs can be redesigned for this in order to increas the torque in the motor.

   

Now I want to clarify the torque of a non-electrical motor design.
The next two show you that with my all magnetic style motors, they have to offset forward and reverse torque on the motor assembly.  This is why I do not spend a lot of time of all magnetic motors because it is hard to get a lot of torque from them.  My designs using electrical power input produce a lot more power and have a greater chance of being used in several applications.


   

   

[Lunkster]

Hello again,

If anyone is going to replicate these designs, I want them to know that the circuits that you use with them can be as or more important than the mechanical design to achieve  the end goal of an overunity system.  On some of the sub-assembly testing I have been doing indicates a need to keep a close eye on these circuits.
In the following drawing, I show you what I found driving some of my coils with a switched DV square wav pulse.  WIth switching speeds below 2000 Hz, I would have large current draws unless I reduced the duty cycle to the device.  My testing used a 20 volt switching signal.  If I drove some of my circuits above 2000Hz, then the output coils in the device would drop off in their voltage.  

   

The next drawing has some thoughts of what I would do.

   

When you have motor designs with coils with electromagnets in them operating with a duty cycle on the coils like I do, then there is an opertunity to collect the energy from the collapsing coils to be used again later on in the devices operation.  The next four drawings are what I was planning to use on one of my Three Layer Electro-mechanical movement motor designs.

   

   

   

   

I want to share one more drawing since the last post I showed you had a combination of the Three Layer Electro-Mechanical Movement technology along with the torque gain techneques in my toroid motor designs.

   

I just want people to be successful in there overunity pursuits.

Lunkster

[Lunkster]

Hello Again,

This attachment has what I believe are my best work from over the years that I have worked on overunity devices.
This file has some of the drawings I have posted but so much more.  I have written a lot about these technologies in this file.  It will be well worth it to be a member to download this file.  


  Free Energy Overunity Toroid Motor Technology.pdf (Size: 6.24 MB / Downloads: 17)

Lunkster

[dd_alf]

This is an impressive amount of work that speaks of dedication. I doubt anyone goes though all the details tho, it is a bit overwhelming. Well for me anyway. In regards to your questions asked, particularly this image: https://www.mooker.com/attachment.php?aid=1377
I would argue: the flux always takes the easiest path. Easiness is defined by length of path, material and saturation. In the example drawn I think the flux completely ignores the right part of the toroid, containing the gap. You could not even stick a nail to it. And regardless of the field created by a coil on the toroid core (saturation issues aside) this flux will just ADD to whatever the coil does. It will be a static bias, not affecting the coil in COP, I would assume.

That said, when I was looking at it, I though it would also be a really interesting design if the gap area were on the other side of the torus, right next to the PM. Then one would close the gap frequently with an iron bar that's spun by a small motor. It would force the PM flux to alternate its path, hence inducing AC into 2 coils, sitting on the top and bottom area of the toroid core. The point however is, I see no reason why this little iron bar, that's rotating in the gap, should face any Lenz drag. (except eddy currents, that can be prevented with nonconductive ferromagnetics, or laminates etc.). In any case the gap must be sized correctly, so the secondary fields of the coils (of opposite polarity) will will not make the long path harder, compared to the gap, resulting in the flux jumping the gap, despite the gap-less long path provided. However, I would use Metglas for the toroid, to increase permeability and subsequently the effect.