04-21-2025, 06:42 AM
Presenting... EMMA
Electro-Magnetic-Mechanical-Apparatus
This device has sufficiently moved beyond the axial variant of the Robert Adams generator that I have been building, so I've given her a name. Look through my previous build logs if you aren't familiar with this device already. The name also perfectly describes what this device is - anything you want it to be. Once you start breaking down all of the components into what they do at the mechanical, magnetic and electric levels - you'll start to understand what I mean.
Here's a summary of the prototype as it currently stands:
24 x 20x20mm N40 Neo's, 15Kg holding force each, 6 magnets per rotor, 4 rotors, ~90Kg combined holdng force on each face of each rotor
12 x pulse coils, wired into two sets (3 x CW + 3 CCW), pulsing 4 rotors every 60 degrees. ~12 ohm per set
12 x generator coils, 6 CW wired in series, 6 CCW wired in series, joined via inner windings. ~45 ohm per set
4 x ceramic bearings, 1 on each end, 2 in the middle
8mm, 600mm linear shaft. Total rotating mass - 2.4Kg
This device represents everything I've learnt over the last few years and proves that overunity, free energy and perpetual motion are all possible, achievable and accessible. Most of this knowledge has already been shared by those that have come before us, however there is ancient knowledge being unearthed. And it is this knowledge that I've used to help correlate what is worth persuing and what is BS.
From all of this there are 3 main principles (gain mechanisms) I am using:
The first is balancing flux density and pressure. 1+1=3. Two magnets are always much stronger than they are individually, and as there are magnets on both ends of the generator coils, there is a significant amount more flux flowing through the cores than a single magnet. 4d=2/2d. This basically says, 4 rotor faces at d distance from coils = 2 rotor faces at d/2 distance from coils, on the same shaft. And because I am balancing the 4 pulse coils with the 2 generator coils (which are adjustable) initially offset at 30 degrees, the net effect is lots of flux and very little to no cogging. I've pursued this aspect heavily - the reason being; if there is less cogging, then the switching of the generator coils won't just be a de-magnetising effect (as Adams stated), but will result in a positive push - just like the pulse coils... Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images.
The second is moving electrons between counterwound coils. Until a sufficient speed is reached (rpm) the action / reaction of a coil that has a magnet passing over it (and under it) results in a sluggish pushing between the shorted generator coil sets - giving us the all too familiar 'bogging' down under load. However at a certain speed (~1800rpm) a speed up occurs due to the initial reaction resistance magically disappearing. I think this is in part due to the magnets not able to fully bias the electrons that have found themselves spinning in a different direction as they transition to the counterwound coil. And this is occurring because the pulse width of the increased speed of the magnets and additional voltage being generated is being forced onto the counterwound coils. This negation of the resistance is then completed when the switch of the generator coils open, removing the coils attempt to resist the magnet moving away. (This is all just my opinion - if someone knows better, please pipe up. I have a feeling this is also why the modified universal motors sped up when shorted - counterwound coils)
The third is achieving magnetic reversal. With the previous two conditions in place, switching all of that voltage generated in such close proximity to the magnet by means of opening a switch will reverse the magnetic field around the coil. Presented with a like field that magnet must respond to achieve equilibrium. This results in the magnet having to momentarily reverse polarity, and as I've got strong magnets on either end of the generator cores AND I've aligned two coils in a row - the reversal wil be MASSIVE (1+1=3), the subsequent response from the magnets are then concentrated back into the coils...and that is when the current flows.
The trick to this is proximity, the closer (~2mm) the magnet is to the coil, the more the magnet has effectively turned the coil core into a magnet - a fractal of itself.
Switching is where this gets dicey... here's a raw and rough video of switching one of the two phases. The orange meter is measuring the voltage from one phase, while the red meter is showing the current from the shorted/switched phase. From this you can now probably appreciate a little better just how much power this will put out once I completely meet all of the conditions above. Shortly after this video I tried a new clean disc and had an inch high full ring of bright white voltage, that left spot welding burn marks - I've switched higher voltages in the past, but have not seen this before.
I'm looking at modifying a 6 cylinder distributor cap and rotor button to put this long standing issue to bed once and for all.
So this is only switching one phase, leaving the other as passive dead weight... input ~32W, Ouput ~150W (75V x 2A)... switching both phases as outlined above will only increase power and rpm... I guess that's one way to trample all over the 3 laws of thermodynamics... and this is the 'just get it running' tune, I haven't even pulled the big guns out yet...
I encourage anyone reading this with a genuine interest to just start building. What I've revealed above is a boiled down version of what the likes of Bedini, Adams, Sweet and many others have already worked out. My whole intention has been to prove it possible by making it simple (ish) and understandable, that way more conversations can be had and more can be learnt.
So you've just been shown free energy and with a little more work, perpetual energy... what do you do now?
Electro-Magnetic-Mechanical-Apparatus
This device has sufficiently moved beyond the axial variant of the Robert Adams generator that I have been building, so I've given her a name. Look through my previous build logs if you aren't familiar with this device already. The name also perfectly describes what this device is - anything you want it to be. Once you start breaking down all of the components into what they do at the mechanical, magnetic and electric levels - you'll start to understand what I mean.
Here's a summary of the prototype as it currently stands:
24 x 20x20mm N40 Neo's, 15Kg holding force each, 6 magnets per rotor, 4 rotors, ~90Kg combined holdng force on each face of each rotor
12 x pulse coils, wired into two sets (3 x CW + 3 CCW), pulsing 4 rotors every 60 degrees. ~12 ohm per set
12 x generator coils, 6 CW wired in series, 6 CCW wired in series, joined via inner windings. ~45 ohm per set
4 x ceramic bearings, 1 on each end, 2 in the middle
8mm, 600mm linear shaft. Total rotating mass - 2.4Kg
This device represents everything I've learnt over the last few years and proves that overunity, free energy and perpetual motion are all possible, achievable and accessible. Most of this knowledge has already been shared by those that have come before us, however there is ancient knowledge being unearthed. And it is this knowledge that I've used to help correlate what is worth persuing and what is BS.
From all of this there are 3 main principles (gain mechanisms) I am using:
The first is balancing flux density and pressure. 1+1=3. Two magnets are always much stronger than they are individually, and as there are magnets on both ends of the generator coils, there is a significant amount more flux flowing through the cores than a single magnet. 4d=2/2d. This basically says, 4 rotor faces at d distance from coils = 2 rotor faces at d/2 distance from coils, on the same shaft. And because I am balancing the 4 pulse coils with the 2 generator coils (which are adjustable) initially offset at 30 degrees, the net effect is lots of flux and very little to no cogging. I've pursued this aspect heavily - the reason being; if there is less cogging, then the switching of the generator coils won't just be a de-magnetising effect (as Adams stated), but will result in a positive push - just like the pulse coils... Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images.
The second is moving electrons between counterwound coils. Until a sufficient speed is reached (rpm) the action / reaction of a coil that has a magnet passing over it (and under it) results in a sluggish pushing between the shorted generator coil sets - giving us the all too familiar 'bogging' down under load. However at a certain speed (~1800rpm) a speed up occurs due to the initial reaction resistance magically disappearing. I think this is in part due to the magnets not able to fully bias the electrons that have found themselves spinning in a different direction as they transition to the counterwound coil. And this is occurring because the pulse width of the increased speed of the magnets and additional voltage being generated is being forced onto the counterwound coils. This negation of the resistance is then completed when the switch of the generator coils open, removing the coils attempt to resist the magnet moving away. (This is all just my opinion - if someone knows better, please pipe up. I have a feeling this is also why the modified universal motors sped up when shorted - counterwound coils)
The third is achieving magnetic reversal. With the previous two conditions in place, switching all of that voltage generated in such close proximity to the magnet by means of opening a switch will reverse the magnetic field around the coil. Presented with a like field that magnet must respond to achieve equilibrium. This results in the magnet having to momentarily reverse polarity, and as I've got strong magnets on either end of the generator cores AND I've aligned two coils in a row - the reversal wil be MASSIVE (1+1=3), the subsequent response from the magnets are then concentrated back into the coils...and that is when the current flows.
The trick to this is proximity, the closer (~2mm) the magnet is to the coil, the more the magnet has effectively turned the coil core into a magnet - a fractal of itself.
Switching is where this gets dicey... here's a raw and rough video of switching one of the two phases. The orange meter is measuring the voltage from one phase, while the red meter is showing the current from the shorted/switched phase. From this you can now probably appreciate a little better just how much power this will put out once I completely meet all of the conditions above. Shortly after this video I tried a new clean disc and had an inch high full ring of bright white voltage, that left spot welding burn marks - I've switched higher voltages in the past, but have not seen this before.
I'm looking at modifying a 6 cylinder distributor cap and rotor button to put this long standing issue to bed once and for all.
So this is only switching one phase, leaving the other as passive dead weight... input ~32W, Ouput ~150W (75V x 2A)... switching both phases as outlined above will only increase power and rpm... I guess that's one way to trample all over the 3 laws of thermodynamics... and this is the 'just get it running' tune, I haven't even pulled the big guns out yet...
I encourage anyone reading this with a genuine interest to just start building. What I've revealed above is a boiled down version of what the likes of Bedini, Adams, Sweet and many others have already worked out. My whole intention has been to prove it possible by making it simple (ish) and understandable, that way more conversations can be had and more can be learnt.
So you've just been shown free energy and with a little more work, perpetual energy... what do you do now?
