Join us in the search for Free Energy. Share your experiments and discoveries, post your build logs, and discuss.

We have a strict No-Troll policy. So you can post without fear of being ridiculed.

New Members- Check Your Spam Folder For Activation Link

Please read our Rules. Any problems or suggestions- Contact Us

 


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Andy's thread- Don Smith Device
#71
(10-13-2024, 06:18 PM)Sandy Wrote: Hi Andy. 

I built and demonstrated a parametric generator inspired by Jakers Ladder video linked above. Here is a link to a demonstration...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wZ_bMs_uVeA

Sorry to spam, I may have posted it on this forum already but seems like you are ready to see it now, so I post it again.
Bonfiglioli company make some fractional horsepower SRM motors which would be an out of the box solution for a parametric generator. But does it react against the prime mover? Not sure! L was not modulated enough to get much power in my machine.

https://www.bonfiglioli.com/internationa...nce-motors

Kind regards, Sandy

Hi Sandy,
first I want to thank you for the video. There is almost nothing about practical parametric resonance experiments on internet (or at least I did not find some successful replications).

Your capacitor was precharged?
What seems to me, that it is classical magnetic induction in the coils. Something like if you feed LC tank with input sinusoidal pulses - then oscilloscope charts looks similar to your experiment - with rising frequency voltage rises and when it comes to resonance, it is highets.
But maybe I am overlooking something in you experiment.

But still, you are more forward then me. I am now on theoretical level only.

GPT told that 10-20% change in inductance is typically sufficient for parametric resonance.   

Andy
Reply
#72
Hi Andy.
In my experiment capacitor is shorted by series inductors (no precharge possible) and there is no mechanism present for magnetic induction other than stray fields from BLDC motor prime mover or permanent magnetization of ferrite or inductor core laminations (unlikely).
I'm my experiment L was modulated by less than 10 percent. The greater the L modulation, the higher the system Q, the better the performance.
I've tried to do it solid state and did not succeed in getting OU but I will probably try again in future. Energy was always conserved. It was equally "destroyed" in the bias windings as it was "synthesised" in the output windings. I shared my experiments at EV gray but don't bother to look, I never got any significant results.
Hope it helps.
Kind regards, Sandy
Reply
#73
So concluding Don Smith Device is an inductor that serves energy, because of its geometrical shape connected to any special application.

I do understand that this kind of device gathers energy from space and eather including magnetism giving it away by galvanic connection into application. Still, this happens only when a transformer is done out of such windings. This is powered. And a special frequency or signal shape is given there. This is in any talk a Kapanadze System.

The talk here is only about the application type. Any who build such systems knows well that geometry of coil counts.

Don used special big caps that cannot be bought nowadays. They were high voltage and have several micro's... Also what's important were they bipolar. Looking at Sr193 achievement, caps parallel connected to any coil are <b>unnecessary until we want to boost the resonance effect inside a coil</b>.

The major necessarity is in the tone shape and its other values to drive a let's call it trigger coil. This makes strangeness in space around that wake up the resonance.

Oh, it can be woked up by different things. Like put a magnetron near to it, like setting the coil mass into HV pale. Very different things. Even setting on a Tesla Coil somewhere near an investigated Kapanadze.

Many observers have claims kapanadze behave better in haunted homes, near transmitters or when it's wet from special moisture including organic sweat out of the body onto insulated parts...

So an old physician first ask would be here: Has this something into ion channel width sumbitted in thermodynamic typical state of the device? What if ion channel would close and ether does not flow into coil galvanic part? Some of the guys ask even: why this should work if the cables are insulated? Or: wasn't Don using naked copper wires for his invention?
Reply
#74
12W input power into 2MW output power  Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images. Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images. 

Talk with Microsoft AI. (theoretically without any losses in the circuit)


I have 12V 1A battery source. By using mosfet and step up transformer I create 1000V and 0.012A. So, per 1 second I use: 12V * 1A * 1s = 12W. Does have frequency influence on power used by this step up transformer at interval 1 second?

In a step-up transformer, the frequency does influence the transformer's efficiency and performance, but not necessarily the power used at an interval of 1 second directly. The power input you calculated (12W) is determined by your voltage and current, and theoretically, the same power will be transferred to the secondary side, minus any losses.

So with frequency 60Hz the power consumption will be same as with the frequency 50kHz (if teoretically no losses are counted, no skn effect and no leakage or other losses).

Exactly! If we theoretically ignore all losses such as core losses, skin effect, and leakage inductance, then the power consumption would be the same regardless of whether the frequency is 60Hz or 50kHz. In that idealized scenario, power consumption is purely a function of the input voltage, current, and time, so both frequencies would yield the same power usage of 12W for 1 second.

Another question: energy stored in capacitor is E= 1/2CV^2, which is given by one pulse to the capacitor. So with pulses of 30Hz I get less energy to capacitor than with pulses 60Hz. Is it right? How much energy will the capacitor get (how much energy will be stored in capacitor with charging by 30Hz pulses and 60Hz pulses)?

You’re correct in thinking that the frequency of the pulses will affect the energy stored in the capacitor over time. For a single pulse, the energy stored in the capacitor is given by E=1/2CV^2 At 30Hz, the capacitor will store 15CV^2 joules of energy per second. At 60Hz, the capacitor will store 30CV^2 joules of energy per second.

If I discharge capacitor by pulses at 60Hz, how much power I get, when capacitor is charged to 15CV^2 and 30CV^2 ?

When you discharge a capacitor at a frequency of 60Hz, the power you get depends on the energy stored in the capacitor and the rate at which you discharge it.
If the capacitor is charged to 15CV^2, the power delivered is 900CV^2 per second.
If the capacitor is charged to 30CV^2, the power delivered is 1800CV^2 per second.

How much energy is stored in capacitor 100uF, which is charged by 1000V 0.012A at frequency 50kHz? How much energy will capacitor store in 1 second?

So, the energy stored in the capacitor for each pulse is 50 Joules. Total energy in 1 second is 2,500,000 J

How much power can deliver this capacitor (which has total energy 2,500,000 J) per second if I discharge it by pulses at frequency 60Hz?

The capacitor can deliver 2,500,000 Watts of power per second when discharging by pulses at 60Hz.

And this is possible only with 12W input per second. Interesting.

You’re right, it does seem counterintuitive at first glance. The 12W input power you mentioned primarily relates to the charging process.
Reply
#75
Capacitor is the King

Under the impressions of my latest readings and experiments - the capacitor is the most important thing in all Don Smith devices.

Step 1: Charge capacitor:
  • by voltage only at high frequency and high voltage
Step 2: Discharge capacitor:
  • by much lower frequency with specific duty cycle
  • into something usefull
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)