ORION- Released Into the Public Domain

[Jim Mac]

Hi RAF,

First is to understand the gain mechanism as disclosed in the "Orion" document on the first post of this thread.  I do not have final plans as it is a work in progress still.  There is more to discover here..

Once you understand the gain mechanism, I am happy to answer detailed questions and share it all.

[RafalKielesinski]

I watched all your videos about it and I understand that you are calling an additional magnetic field that rotates in the opposite direction than the Engine Shaft, so it’s a great idea to cancel Lenz, do I understand it correctly? After watching the last video, I think you’re using the method with rotating brushes, right?

[Jim Mac]

I watched all your videos about it and I understand that you are calling an additional magnetic field that rotates in the opposite direction than the Engine Shaft, so it’s a great idea to cancel Lenz, do I understand it correctly? After watching the last video, I think you’re using the method with rotating brushes, right?

Yes that is correct.   The first method has an issue so the brushed way is working as expected.   

Also, I have realized we don't even need to rotate the brushes!  The armature and commutator can be wired to do it with stationary brushes.

[ovun987]

HAH..  Looping one of the outputs to the input SUSTAINS THE MOTOR!



It's not OU yet because I am powering the brushes.  But this is the effect clear as day!

Absolutely nuts! Super cool, Jim! 

A+++

[Jim Mac]

Thanks Ovun!

BROTHERS!  I think I cracked it wide open now...  BIG Update..

This fucker can spin the motor PURELY ON LENZ!   I don't even need to loop the output to the motor, I can disconnect that shit...


The more power I pump into the armature, the quicker it spins, AND the more output it produces..  This absolutely needs to be wound with the right gauge wires and a proper output coil




I don't want to hear no comments that it's the power to the brushes turning it.  IT HAS NO FIELD COILS OR MAGNETS!   The Output Coil is the Field!

[Sandy]

Hi Jim.
Thanks for sharing. I would guess about 40ohms each for stator coils so about 200 watts copper loss as output. Is this about right? How much is going in via the Variac?
Kind regards, Sandy

[RafalKielesinski]

What about a description of the construction?

I'd also like to experiment Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register at the forum by clicking here to see images.

[ks6000]

Well done Jim. This is absolutely amazing. Thank you for posting everything (unlike others).

[Jim Mac]

Sandy-  one of the output coils is 11.5 ohms.  The other is 32 ohms.  The wire gauge is very small.  The stator is a stock wound dishwasher motor stator.  It's definitely NOT the right choice for this machine, plus the fit is not perfect, it has a larger than normal gap compared to a matching armature / stator rig.  The output is wired for 2 phases 90 degrees.  And both need to be harvested from to get the most speedup effect.  My current leaning is-  the more output phases the better, as it will push that armature from more angles during rotation.

Raf-  First you need an armature and output stator that is suitable.  This build uses a 16 slot armature with 16 contacts. I think the more the better, but they should be an even number of slots / contacts and the slot count should match the commutator contact count.

Also, you will need to re-configure the brush alignment.  In a standard motor, the brushes are aligned at 180 degrees.  This won't work here because in order to get the armature's magnetic field to rotate counter the shaft, the field needs to rotate 2X the frequency as the shaft.  So the formula is  Total frequency = RPM of the field MINUS RPM of the shaft

To get a winding pattern that does that with 2 pole, the brushes can no longer be 180 degrees apart.  Maybe it's possible with a different pole count, but I have not looked deeply at different pole counts as of yet

[SEYCHELLES]

Good on you. You are letting THE GENIE out of the lamp, be careful what wish you ask for.