Amplifying Output- Showing Results

[Jim Mac]

I want to share what I have been working on..

The Goal-  To use the induced magnetic field of an output coil to ASSIST power production of another Induced Output coil.

I have found several configurations that work, but none as impressive as this configuration.  It allows 2 induced output coils to harness each others flux for additional output.



Will It Load the Source?  -   If the source field is produced in a way that allows magnetic coupling, then Yes, the input will raise.  But if the source induces with no magnetic coupling (such as rotating fields), then it can not couple to the input.

Does Output Increase With Frequency?  -  Results are promising and suggesting YES.  I will be posting another video a little later showing this.

Was this effect exploited before?  I believe Yes.  I believe this was the effect the Hubbard Coil used, but in a slightly different embodiment. I also believe Figuera was using this same principle which Buforn's drawings exposed.  

Why is it special?  Because we are using the magnetic field of multiple output coils to produce additional power in all the coils.

[Jim Mac]

And as promised, here is the Video of output scaling with frequency..



This is the trick that unlocks true output and frequency scaling in motionless magnetic rotation devices.

[Jim Mac]

Here is another embodiment of the same principle- that should produce a similar effect..

   

Using a C-Core, wrap a figure 8 around both legs as a single coil.  Then equally induce both legs with the same magnetic polarity at the same phase. You "Should" see output raise with frequency.

Alternatively, wrap separate coils around each leg.  Load both individually keeping them isolated.  Then you should see output increase when one output compresses and induces the other output.

But as said, if the primary coil is standard AC driven, you will see the effect, BUT standard AC driven coils will magnetically couple with the output, so you WILL see the input raise.

To use this effect for benefit, the primary inducer must be either virtual rotation or another means where the output does not couple with the source.

[andy]

Hi Jim,
Can the effect you are observing be similar to the principle described in the pdf [originating from Fernandez]?

A.

[Jim Mac]

Hi Jim,
Can the effect you are observing be similar to the principle described in the pdf [originating from Fernandez]?

A.

Hi Andy, I remember that paper from a few years back.  I do not see a direct correlation from what I've shown. 

I the most basic terms I can muster up:

1. Primary induces current in output coil's A + B equally.
2. The newly induced coils (A and B) exhibit their own magnet fields.
3. The output magnetic fields from A and B are now correctly aligned to induce each other in an additive way.

Thus unlocking output scaling.  

To take full advantage of this, the "Primary" should be designed in a way that prevents magnetic coupling

[Jim Mac]

The percentages are wild..

Makes you take a double-take at the "Hubbard Coil"  and Hendershot" devices  and how they operated.

Without sourcing extra flux somewhere, there is no Overunity.