Opposite approach to Virtual Magnetic Rotation

[Jim Mac]

Well it is my way to encourage others to do these kinds of experiments.  

Again, you are building a system that I do not understand fully.  And really, we never know the extent of another persons imagination or ingenuity so we should let them try to face-off against the problems that may arise without shutting it down.

But discussing potential pitfalls and past results is always helpful. I am attaching a pic of Tesla's Bifilar, which we can observe both windings go the same way.

   


If this coil was induced, the current in both windings would travel the same way.  But it seems you are speaking of the induction that will occur between windings.  But it is my guess that any induction that occurs between windings would just add extra impendence to the induced current flow. And even if it did manage to flow real current in the counter direction, you would now have 2 coils sending current to each-other in a way that cancels out the output. 

But your thought is on the track to what I am doing.  Now instead of the 2 windings in 1 phase, make the 2 windings 90 degrees out of phase.  Then it becomes possible to combine the outputs in series and Balance Lorentz.  Because 2 phases 90 degrees shifted causes one to be rising as the other is shrinking at all times.  When 1 is at peak, the other is at zero.  Now the phases become "Constructive" and can be combined while balancing Lorentz.

This is exactly what I am working on.  But I am learning that there is more to it than that alone..  The method in which the 2 phases are produced by the source is crucial to success also..

I will be watching...

[Classic]

@Jim, “induction that occur between windings” does not lead to increased impedance, is exactly the opposite effect and will leave the armature with just pure resistance given from wires thickness and length. The current is not canceled, is amplified. Inductance indeed is affected and go higher.

Let me quote:

A flat bifilar coil has several benefits, including:

Improved Efficiency: Bifilar coils are wound with two parallel wires, which reduces the resistance and increases the coil's efficiency in applications like transformers and inductors.
Balanced Current Distribution: The two wires in a bifilar coil carry equal and opposite currents. This balanced current distribution minimizes the generation of electromagnetic interference (EMI) and reduces losses due to skin effect.
Enhanced Magnetic Field: Bifilar winding increases the magnetic field strength, making it suitable for applications where a strong magnetic field is required, such as in power electronics.
Reduced Eddy Currents: The bifilar winding also reduces eddy current losses, making the coil more efficient, especially at high frequencies.
Improved Heat Dissipation: The flat shape of the coil allows for better heat dissipation, which can be advantageous in high-power applications.
Compact Design: Flat bifilar coils can be wound in a compact manner, saving space in electronic devices.
Precise Control: Bifilar coils can be designed with precision to meet specific electrical and magnetic characteristics required for a particular application.
Overall, the use of a flat bifilar coil can lead to improved performance and efficiency in various electrical and electronic devices.

Unless someone can prove the opposite, my opinion is bifilar coils are not suitable for generation with the help of kinetics aka dynamo/alternators, have a look at few patents of Tesla regarding dynamo and see he used diferent windings than what we can see in modern devices/motors/alternators. As the modern ones are specifically designed not to let you go over unity … they only favour bigoilco.

Two capacitor of the same value placed in dead center of the bifilar will induce 180 degree phase shift, if one of those two is double capacitance phase shift will be 135 degree but will double the frequency.

Let’s keep it simple and think which effect we need for what, as there are many ways to skin a rabbit and everyone should look for the way they understand and work better for their setups.

[Jim Mac]

You're right.  Hooking up the 2 windings in parallel will induce more current and less resistance when a load is tied between the 2 paralleled leads. And yes the current would be travelling in opposite ways.  But that is not how the picture I posed is wired. To hook it up like that, both windings will be turning in opposite directions to get current in opposite directions. But even that way, the magnetic poles of the coils will remain the same.  

And YES I am referring to a standard system where a magnet passes the coil with Kinetic energy.  You seems to be wanting to use it for some different system, so maybe it will work for you.

[fxeconomist]

And YES I am referring to a standard system where a magnet passes the coil with Kinetic energy.  You seems to be wanting to use it for some different system, so maybe it will work for you.

Exactly, you don't need bifilars because your system is rotor-less. My system is stator-less, but even so, Lorentz can push against the entire assembly. I will have to make a bifilar test once I get the assembly back from the engineers. I expect resuming everything in February. And probably by March to finish the prototype.