(02-07-2024, 01:37 AM)unimmortal Wrote: Great work Jim. I've been looking into how to do the exact same thing (I'll get started on the bench shortly). The idea of reciprocation I have long held as the key and ran into the same issue pulsing coils either side of a rotor - separate isolated ground. I'm aiming for a perpetual mechanical shaft, and what you've done electrically might be the solution.
Thanks- I have been working at this a while now, so here are some hints:
First, as you know, every action creates an equal and opposite reaction. In electromagnetism, this reaction is CEMF (or reciprocal induction). This "reaction" keeps us under unity.
So we need to create
2 separate equal and opposite actions on different circuits, so now the equal and opposite reactions of each circuit can be utilized by the opposite circuit.
Basically, the opposite reaction of an opposite circuit is EXACTLY what the first circuit needs to self sustain. And I believe this can be accomplished by simply cross connecting the grounds. But the circuit NEEDS 2 batteries, 1 battery for each circuit.
Capacitors do not work because they have DC blocking when positive voltage enters the negative. And there are phase problems when using rectified AC from a transformer as a source.
See, if we rectify AC, the negative terminal of a FWBR creates a parallel path for the return current. The current entering a FWBR's negative can either flow back into the secondary of a transformer (thus lowering the input current) OR it can bypass that and series sum it's voltage by exiting the positive DC leg of the FWBR.
We want the latter. Sure lowering the input looks cool, but that's not what we want. We want it to sum with the supply voltage to produce us more output. And every time I tried with AC input, the negative from the opposite circuit ALWAYS chooses to go through the secondary and lower the input current. But it "might" work if we can phase the input AC exactly perfect.
But batteries are perfect. They are designed to sum voltage when in series and provide no alternative paths EXCEPT to series. But measurements get difficult. Connect 2 batteries in series and close the loop into itself and anywhere you try to measure voltage will only show the voltage of 1 battery even though we know the voltage is doubled because they are in series.
Now regarding the coils, the primary coils become the 2nd "battery" of each circuit. And these coils are continually charged by the reciprocal CEMF of the secondary.
This all sounds super confusing , I know. But an alternator that uses physical motion does this naturally and is the very reason it can produce 20 times the output that is needed to sustain the magnetic field of the rotor. The alternator has the innate ability to sum it's CEMF with the battery to increase the field of the rotor with regards to frequency. The quicker the alternator spins, the more CEMF is produced, which series connects through the battery to amplify the magnetic field of the rotor. Thus raising output with frequency.
This can be done with no Motion and thus NO DRAG. But the design is MUCH MORE than just establishing magnetic rotation.. The magnetic rotation has to be created in such a way that the CEMF (reciprocal induction) is able to sum with the input voltage at the exact time it is needed.
Finally I did not explain why a transformer does not do this correctly. but YES even a transformer SUMS the voltage, BUT that summing hurts us.. When the AC wave of the primary is trying to DECLINE, the battery voltage sums and puts out more potential when the wave is trying to reduce potential. So it fights against it's own decline.
There is probably more to this I am not seeing yet. And this is all just my "Theories" at this point. And YES the textbooks contradict my outlook, as do mainstream understandings. My rebuke is, show me in the textbooks where it explains why my input went DOWN by more than 70% when I short my outputs together.